Monday, March 23, 2009

Gnocchi with Pesto

Gnocchi and pesto are two of my favorite recent discoveries. I had gnocchi for the first time last summer at a little cafe in Brooklyn - unbelievable. How had I never tried them before is beyond me. A few months later I decided to try to make them on my own with pesto, and now I can't imagine my life without pesto. I seriously can eat it by the forkful. It grosses the boyfriend out, but yummmm. I kinda wing it when I make gnocchi and pesto. The recipes are pretty easy and very very tasty - and I love eating the leftovers for the next few days!




Gnocchi

Adapted from Martha Stewart's recipe

4 big potatoes
2 eggs
Flour

Wash the potatoes and chop into big pieces so they will cook faster. Bring enough water to cover the potatoes to a boil and cook until the potatoes are tender. Drain and let cool. Once cool, the potato skins should peel off easily.

After the skins have been removed, mash the potatoes however works best. I use my hand mixer but if you have a ricer or a masher that should work too, as long as you get rid of all the chunks you possibly can.

When the potatoes are smooth, crack in 2 eggs and some flour (I start with a cup or so). Knead until everything is incorporated. The mixture needs to get to the point that its not sticky any more, so keep adding flour by the cupful and kneading in until your mixture is not sticky.

When the mixture is smooth, grab a big handful and roll into a rope just like you used to to with Play Doh when you were a kid. I like big fat gnocchi so i roll big fat ropes - but not too big, because you want them to cook through. Cut into bite sized pieces. Drop by the batch into a pot of boiling water; the gnocchi will sink. When they rise to the top they are done; remove with a slotted spoon.

This recipe makes a LOT - enough for dinner and 2 lunches for the 2 of us PLUS more to freeze. Adjust accordingly.




Pesto

1 pack basil
Garlic (I used the chopped stuff)
Olive oil
Parmesan Reggiano cheese

I don't use pine nuts because they are too expensive. I grab a big sharp knife and chop everything together until its a nice paste. Garlic to your taste; I like lots of it. Add enough olive oil so that you form a coherent paste, but not so much that its oozy. Enjoy!!

Bored Bored Bored

Just out of the oven and cooling on the counter: I have to stop baking. I have brownies to finish/resist.

Will be cooking for dinner tonight: Haven't decided yet. Pizza? Chicken and asparagus? We will see.

Currently drinking: Water. Just bought a Brita. Genius.

Playing on the iPod right now: I need a new iPod.

Currently checked out from the library: Getting a library card is on my To Do list.

Currently reading: Little Women

Would like to buy: There's a whole list. New iPod. Bike. Stand mixer. Summer dress. Don't worry, I don't have enough money for any of these things.

Laughing about: UA

Anxiously awaiting: A friggen job.

Needs: A friggen job.

Crazy Future Aspirations: To try and take over the world.

Attempting to Learn: Gardening. Sweet.

Must Resist: Brownies. They are callllllllling me.

What’s Keeping Me Busy: Nothing, absolutely nothing. I'm bored.

Hyped Up About: The beach!

Waiting For: My dad to text me. Yeah, my dad texts.

Craving: Brrrrrrrrrrrrownies.

If I had magical powers: I would get a job.

Looking forward to: Everything!

Friday, March 20, 2009

Progress

Vermont is jumping on the (tiny) bandwagon.

I am unemployed, which means I have a LOT of time on my hands. I saw this article the article above this morning and started doing some research.

Personally, I'm all for gay rights. I'm of the belief that who another person marries has absolutely zero impact on my life, so let them do what they want. I think of it as choosing a pet. I'm a dog person, and a big dog person at that. I want a Great Dane, aka a small horse. Someone else may like cats. You wouldn't ever ever catch me voluntarily bringing home a cat, not in a million years, but I don't give a crap if someone else does. Same idea. Just substitute people for pets.

One big area of concern for proponents and opponents of gay marriage alike is procreation. There are a lot of questions, the biggest being whether the sexual orientation of the parent has any detrimental effect on the child(ren). This is what I looked at today, and this is what I found:



In this article in the Pittsburgh Post Gazette:

A number of professional medical organizations -- including the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Psychiatric Association -- have issued statements claiming that a parent's sexual orientation is irrelevant to his or her ability to raise a child.

For the most part, the organizations are relying on a relatively small but conclusive body of research -- approximately 67 studies -- looking at children of gay parents and compiled by the American Psychological Association. In study after study, children in same-sex parent families turned out the same, for better or for worse, as children in heterosexual families.

Moreover, a 2001 meta-analysis of those studies found that the sexual orientation of a parent is irrelevant to the development of a child's mental health and social development and to the quality of a parent-child relationship.



Abstract of this study done by the University of Virginia:

Does parental sexual orientation affect child development, and if so, how? Studies using convenience samples, studies using samples drawn from known populations, and studies based on samples that are representative of larger populations all converge on similar conclusions. More than two decades of research has failed to reveal important differences in the adjustment or development of children or adolescents reared by same-sex couples compared to those reared by other-sex couples. Results of the research suggest that qualities of family relationships are more tightly linked with child outcomes than is parental sexual orientation.



The American Psychological Association says:

"there is no scientific evidence that parenting effectiveness is related to parental sexual orientation: lesbian and gay parents are as likely as heterosexual parents to provide supportive and healthy environments for their children (Patterson, 2000, 2004; Perrin, 2002; Tasker, 1999);"

"research has shown that the adjustment, development, and psychological well-being of children is unrelated to parental sexual orientation and that the children of lesbian and gay parents are as likely as those of heterosexual parents to flourish (Patterson, 2004; Perrin, 2002; Stacey & Biblarz, 2001)"

"Many lesbians and gay men are parents. In the 2000 U. S. Census, 33% of female same-sex couple households and 22% of male same-sex couple households reported at least one child under the age of 18 living in the home. Despite the significant presence of at least 163,879 households headed by lesbian or gay parents in U.S. society, three major concerns about lesbian and gay parents are commonly voiced (Falk, 1994; Patterson, Fulcher & Wainright, 2002). These include concerns that lesbians and gay men are mentally ill, that lesbians are less maternal than heterosexual women, and that lesbians' and gay men's relationships with their sexual partners leave little time for their relationships with their children. In general, research has failed to provide a basis for any of these concerns (Patterson, 2000, 2004a; Perrin, 2002; Tasker, 1999; Tasker & Golombok, 1997). First, homosexuality is not a psychological disorder (Conger, 1975). Although exposure to prejudice and discrimination based on sexual orientation may cause acute distress (Mays & Cochran, 2001; Meyer, 2003), there is no reliable evidence that homosexual orientation per se impairs psychological functioning. Second, beliefs that lesbian and gay adults are not fit parents have no empirical foundation (Patterson, 2000, 2004a; Perrin, 2002). Lesbian and heterosexual women have not been found to differ markedly in their approaches to child rearing (Patterson, 2000; Tasker, 1999). Members of gay and lesbian couples with children have been found to divide the work involved in childcare evenly, and to be satisfied with their relationships with their partners (Patterson, 2000, 2004a). The results of some studies suggest that lesbian mothers' and gay fathers' parenting skills may be superior to those of matched heterosexual parents. There is no scientific basis for concluding that lesbian mothers or gay fathers are unfit parents on the basis of their sexual orientation (Armesto, 2002; Patterson, 2000; Tasker & Golombok, 1997). On the contrary, results of research suggest that lesbian and gay parents are as likely as heterosexual parents to provide supportive and healthy environments for their children."

and

"Results of social science research have failed to confirm any of these concerns about children of lesbian and gay parents (Patterson, 2000, 2004a; Perrin, 2002; Tasker, 1999). Research suggests that sexual identities (including gender identity, gender-role behavior, and sexual orientation) develop in much the same ways among children of lesbian mothers as they do among children of heterosexual parents (Patterson, 2004a). Studies of other aspects of personal development (including personality, self-concept, and conduct) similarly reveal few differences between children of lesbian mothers and children of heterosexual parents (Perrin, 2002; Stacey & Biblarz, 2001; Tasker, 1999). However, few data regarding these concerns are available for children of gay fathers (Patterson, 2004b). Evidence also suggests that children of lesbian and gay parents have normal social relationships with peers and adults (Patterson, 2000, 2004a; Perrin, 2002; Stacey & Biblarz, 2001; Tasker, 1999; Tasker & Golombok, 1997). The picture that emerges from research is one of general engagement in social life with peers, parents, family members, and friends. Fears about children of lesbian or gay parents being sexually abused by adults, ostracized by peers, or isolated in single-sex lesbian or gay communities have received no scientific support. Overall, results of research suggest that the development, adjustment, and well-being of children with lesbian and gay parents do not differ markedly from that of children with heterosexual parents"


There's a lot of stuff out there that find different conclusions. On the whole, however, those are not scientific articles published in scientific journals based on scientific research. They are opinions, church statements, political statements, journal articles pointing out all the flaws in articles that find no problem with gay parenting, etc etc etc. I'm gonna go with the scientific stuff. Do you know you can find seemingly-authoritative stuff on the web that argues smoking doesn't cause cancer? I'm not trying to argue the nuances of the word "cause" here, like many of these articles. Fact is, smoking puts you at a increasingly higher risk for developing cancer. (Random side note: one article I found argues that a 'paranormal wave' causes cancer. Not anything else. Like smoking or the sun or asbestos. Good one, crazy man, why dont you pass that along to my grandparents?) The point that I'm making is that there's a lot of crap out there regarding smoking and cancer, and that I'm going to rely on the data and opinions of the many research hospitals and universities, medical professionals, and medical organizations like WHO and CDC. Not crazy meta physicists and people paid by the tobacco industry. Same idea with this homosexual parenting stuff - I feel pretty confident in the official positions American Psychological Association and American Medical Association. The end :)

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Incoming!

I haven't been good lately... I've been cooking, just not posting :) I'm still getting the hang of this take-pictures-of-your-food-so-it-can-go-on-the-internet thing. So weird. But I have a big week of baking coming up... a cake for a friend's birthday on Thursday AND pie for 3.14.2009. I don't know what kind of cake I'm going to make yet... thinking something with an obscene amount of chocolate... and the pie will be Boston Creme. Yum! But, long story short, things should be picking up around here verrrrry soon!

Sunday, March 8, 2009

Rugelach: Fail. Then Redemption.

First of all... I like Jews. I think they are great people. I love Paul Simon. I love my Jewish boyfriend, and I love love love being around for his holidays, because if its one thing Jews like to do, its eat. My kind of people. I can go on and on about the merits of a good kugel, or what I think makes latkes perfect, or why challah really does make the best french toast. One thing, though, that I think is sorely lacking in Jewish cooking is dessert. I'm a chocolate lover, and things like honey cake and hamantaschen and mandelbrot just don't do it for me. Le sigh.

One dessert I had really enjoyed was rugelach. Rugelach has been floating around the food blogging world ever since the Tuesdays with Dorie group made them, and I thought they would be a perfect way to get rid of the extreme amount of jam I had sitting around my house: 1 jar of blueberry, 2 strawberry, 1 blackberry, 1 orange, and 1 grape. Sheesh, and I don't even really like jelly!

Let me tell you... it wasn't pretty.

I followed Dorie's recipe for the cookie exactly. It came out perfectly... a little flaky, with a delicious cream cheesey flavor. The filling I just kinda made up as I went, mainly because I wanted to get rid of as much jelly as possible so I wasn't wasting any time with nuts or fruit!

4 ounces cold cream cheese, cut into 4 pieces
1 stick cold unsalted butter, cut into 4 pieces
1 cup all purpose flour
1/4 teaspoon salt

Let the cream cheese and butter rest on counter for 10 minutes. It should be slightly softened but cool.

Put the flour and salt in a mixing bowl, scatter over the chunks of cream cheese and butter and mix, just until the dough forms large curds. Do not work the dough too long.

Remove the dough from the mixing bowl and divide into half. Shape each half into a disk, wrap in plastic wrap and then refrigerate for at least 2 hours, or up to a day. (dough can be frozen for up to 2 months.)

Shape the cookies: On a lightly floured surface, roll 1 round of dough into an 11- to 12-inch circle.

Spoon (or brush) a thin gloss of jam over the dough, and spread with jam.

Using a pizza wheel or a sharp knife, cut the dough into 16 wedges, or triangles.

Starting at the base of each triangle, roll the dough up so that each triangle becomes a little crescent.

So this is where things started to go wrong... I definitely did not spread "a thin gloss of jam over the dough." I slathered it on there. I wanted this jelly out of my fridge! Bad move.

Bake: Position the racks to divide the oven into thirds and preheat the oven to 350F.

Bake the cookies for 20 to 25 minutes, rotating the sheets from top to bottom and front to back at the midway point, until they are puffed and golden.

Transfer the cookies to racks to cool to just warm or to room temperature.

The first batch was a MESS! The dough had unwrapped and all the jelly had come spilling out all over the place.




This guy was the worst... he was literally a flat cookie with some jelly in the middle. Arg!




But, like any good cook, I tried to learn from my mistakes. With the next round of dough I was MUCH more careful with my jelly application, and they came out great!



Yum!

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

Barf

Here's how lunch went today:


11:30 - Stomach rumbles. Feel slightly guilty about being hungry because, seriously, only ate breakfast 2 hours ago.

11:33 - Devour a yogurt. Feel happy that it is a Lite Yogurt. Also, thank higher power for Ralph's.

12:02 - Hungry. Again. Honestly, stomach?

12:03 - Forage in fridge. Thank higher power that you can't afford bad-for-you foods.

12:04 - Emerge victoriously with pint of blueberries! Thank higher power for Walmart and cheap produce.

12:09 - Realize you've absentmindedly ingested the entire pint of blueberries, which were of questionable expiration date, being a Walmart special and all. Feel slightly sick. Decide to take a nap on the couch. Thank higher power for unemployment (but pray for a job soon), and also for free housing.

In related news, I'm kinda loving my life right now.

Sunday, March 1, 2009

Banana Bread

We all have one: a go-to recipe for Banana Bread. Whenever I see a few sad looking bananas browning on my countertop I know I can dig through my mom's recipe folder and find my family's recipe, the same one that my grandmother taught my mom how to make. Except this time, with these sad looking bananas, that tattered piece of paper was about 2500 miles away (and my mother is notorious for not picking up/returning phone calls) and I had to go looking for a new recipe.

I had a few important constraints when looking for a recipe, namely in ingredients. I had 3 bananas, half a stick of butter, and absolutely no motivation to go to the store. Besides the normal cast of characters this recipe calls for plain yogurt - genius! - giving it a nice moist texture.






Banana Bread



Original Recipe found here


2 cups all-purpose flour
3/4 teaspoon baking soda
1/2 teaspoon salt
1 cup sugar
1/4 cup butter, softened
2 large eggs
1 1/2 cups mashed ripe banana (about 3 bananas)
1/3 cup plain low-fat yogurt
1 teaspoon vanilla extract
Cooking spray


Preheat oven to 350°.

Lightly spoon flour into dry measuring cups; level with a knife. Combine the flour, baking soda, and salt, stirring with a whisk.
Place sugar and butter in a large bowl, and beat with a mixer at medium speed until well blended (about 1 minute). Add the eggs, 1 at a time, beating well after each addition.
Add banana, yogurt, and vanilla; beat until blended.
Add flour mixture; beat at low speed just until moist. Spoon batter into an 8 1/2 x 4 1/2-inch loaf pan coated with cooking spray.
Bake at 350° for 1 hour or until a wooden pick inserted in center comes out clean. Cool 10 minutes in pan on a wire rack; remove from pan. Cool completely on wire rack.